<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dobies Healthcare Blog &#187; patient reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dobies.com/blog/tag/patient-reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dobies.com/blog</link>
	<description>Engage at a deeper level.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:39:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Do Patients Have the Right to Rant or Rave about Their Doctors Online?</title>
		<link>http://www.dobies.com/blog/2010/01/26/managing-physician-reputation-online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dobies.com/blog/2010/01/26/managing-physician-reputation-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carol Dobies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Marketing Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patient reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputation management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dobies.com/blog/?p=603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allowing patients to review doctors on Web sites is not only is in the best interest of consumers and public health, but it is also a matter of freedom of speech. In fairness, however, I believe doctors should be exempt from federal privacy laws that prevent them from publicly responding to patients. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-605" title="Some physicians are asking patients to sign &quot;gag order&quot; waivers to prevent ranting on review Web sites" src="http://www.dobies.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/silencedman-380x252.jpg" alt="Some physicians are asking patients to sign &quot;gag order&quot; waivers to prevent ranting on review Web sites" width="380" height="252" />Transparency in quality reporting goes both ways.  Good ratings &#8211; and bad &#8211; are posted every day for all kinds of products and services. When it comes to health care, I absolutely believe in transparency and public reporting of quality and patient safety measures. In fact, right now we&#8217;re in the process of creating a brand new &#8220;Quality Matters&#8221; microsite for one of our clients.</p>
<p>Recently, MSNBC reported that some physicians were having <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34794632/ns/health-health_care/ " target="_blank">patients sign &#8220;gag order&#8221; waivers </a>to prevent their ranting on review Web sites. Unbelievable.  Would you trust a physician who required you to sign such a document? Allowing patients to review doctors on Web sites is not only is in the best interest of consumers and public health, but it is also a matter of freedom of speech. In fairness, however, I believe doctors should be exempt from federal privacy laws that prevent them from publicly responding to patients. </p>
<p>As healthcare marketers, we may not be able to change federal law, but we can help manage the reputation of our physician clients on these Web sites.  Here&#8217;s how:</p>
<ol>
<li>Use a username that clearly identifies you as a representative from the practice, such as OfficeMgr_SmithMedical, with proper contact information in the user profile.</li>
<li>Acknowledge comments with replies that let reviewers know you are listening (without, of course, acknowledging patient name or identification).</li>
<li>Direct patients to contact a specific person at the practice to voice concerns and resolve issues.</li>
<li>Encourage reviewers to continue the conversation with your practice.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dobies.com/blog/2010/01/26/managing-physician-reputation-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

